She got here earlier than I thought! I am so excited! I bought my first dress form. Joanns had a sale (she was $99)- so I went for it. It is the Singer dressform #150. Reading the reviews over the past year (I have been looking at it forever)- I knew it might not be the most sturdy contraption and there was a chance it might need to be returned...
|
arrived in one piece! |
It is not as pretty as a custom made model (which I would love to have some day though my weight fluctuates a lot so I am not sure it would be worth the expense). To be honest- I was a little horrified at how MUCH I had to open her up to make her my size. I ordered the small size, and I am at the large end of that small (I wear a 10 in RTW). And then- looking at her- I thought- am I really that big around the waist? *gasp* That shock has worn off and now I think she is pretty fine looking. *wink*
|
here she is- before I had kids... |
A little plug for Joanns- I had held off ordering because I thought they would only ship parcel post to FPOs (military PO boxes). That would mean it would take about 5 to 7 weeks, or more. Instead of going by airplane- it would be on the "slow boat" to
China Japan. But it only took about 2 weeks instead, maybe less. Needless to say, I was over the top thrilled when the guy at the post office brought out my big box!!
One of the things I had read about the Singer dressforms is that they are hard to make the adjustments on. Reading the directions that come with, I can totally get that. But I figured it out. If you have to make "large" adjustments [ie. more than 2 or 3 inches], then it is easier to start off small on ALL of the dials, and then go back and gradually increase them. So I started at the bust, then the waist and then the hips- each time little by little.
I made a dress for my Singapore trip (actually- I made two)- I didn't take it with me though. I thought it was a 70s pattern- just looked and it says 1981- close enough. It is Simplicity 9898...
I made this dress back in high school out of red Kona cotton, I wish I had kept it. I forgot and failed to notice when I was cutting out the pieces this time around, how LOW it is in the back! I am not a fan of backless dresses- mainly because I high those unsightly back rolls. I will still wear it- but I will have to wear a jacket or sweater to cover the back. Otherwise- I love the dress, and especially the fabric and print. I just love Amy Butler.
|
do you see what I did wrong? |
|
do you see it now |
Technically- I didn't have enough yardage for this pattern. But I was determined to make it work! Unfortunately, I cut the bodice pieces upside down! So not only was I short on yardage, but the pattern only goes one way! I looked up the fabric on Fabric.com's website to be sure I had the leaves pointing the right way. For some reason I still cut the bodice pieces wrong. Seeing that I had NO fabric left, I couldn't make new pieces. In fact, I had to piece-meal the waistband and tie. This is what happens when I stay up late sewing.
|
backside- very low back |
I have been so very busy lately and frankly I should be in bed instead of blogging. I have another dress I made to display for you as well- though I will have to iron it first, lol.
I love her! My sewing space in my living room, so she is standing next to my sewing table. It takes some getting used to. I keep seeing her out of the corner of my eye and I have to do a double take because I think there is someone standing there. LOL!!